By Pamela R. Winnick
We live in frightening occasions. Very frightening instances. yet we've not gotten right here accidentally. it has been a strategy of committed motion at the a part of pushed participants and teams. They used to name themselves eugenicists. yet then Hitler utilized their rules in Germany and so they needed to locate one other label. at the present time, a lot of them are "social biologists" or "population regulate advocates" (Seriously... The magazine of Social Biology was known as the magazine of the yank Eugenics Society). no matter what they name themselves, those self-appointed elite have used technological know-how as a sledgehammer, chipping away on the ethical foundations of our tradition.
Driving them is that this: the construction of an ideal society. through excellent, they suggest a society with no poverty, affliction or struggle. Sounds extraordinary does not it? For the "science crusaders," the imaginative and prescient is so appealing few (or many) lives may be sacrificed achieve it.
If you actually need to understand extra approximately this technique, you need to learn Pamela Winnick's publication. In it, she information how an alarming variety of scientists are actively pursuing this new global, one who would possibly not contain you or me (The purely ethical velocity bumps for such scientists are the moralists they runs over on their option to utopia). i do know. i do know. It sounds severe. It appears like a reactionary, fear-mongering evangelical has painted his wooden signal and taken out his bullhorn. So, i will allow you to be the pass judgement on. ponder:
* Nobel Prize-winning physicist William Shockley brazenly endorsed selective sterilization for the bad and
* Biology professor Garrett Hardin took this message to the biology textbooks writing: "People of low I.Q. are reproducing at a speedier cost than people with a excessive I.Q." and that "[s]ooner or later ... human inhabitants will succeed in a limit.... ultimately, now not all of the childrens that people are keen to procreate can continue to exist. both there has to be a comparatively painless hunting down sooner than beginning or a extra painful and wasteful removing of people after birth."
* after which there is H. Bently Glass, former elected president of the yank organization for the development of technology: "It can now not be affirmed that definitely the right of the guy and girl to breed as they see healthy is inviolate... [N]o mom and dad will ... have a correct to burden society with a malformed or mentally incompetent child."
For a style in their acidic conceitedness, reflect on Dr. Christiaan Barnard's phrases prior to Congress as he strongly
resisted public oversight of scientific learn:
"Let us take care to not shackle the investigator with pointless strictures, with a view to dry up untapped assets of creativity.... while you're considering theologians, attorneys, philosophers and others to provide a few direction.... i can't see how they can help."
And you cannot even start to think the learn they've been doing. yet to benefit extra approximately this flow and its implications, you need to learn A Jealous God. it's a well-researched expos
Read or Download A Jealous God: Science's Crusade Against Religion PDF
Similar politics & state books
The 3rd quantity within the reports in Rhetoric & faith sequence, Preaching Politics strains the staggering and lasting effect of 1 of yankee history's such a lot interesting and enigmatic figures--George Whitefield. Jerome Mahaffey explores George Whitefield's function in making a "rhetoric of neighborhood" that effectively verified a typical worldview one of many colonial cultures.
Faith and Politics within the usa, 6th version, bargains a accomplished account of the function of spiritual rules, associations and groups in American existence. This e-book examines the methods faith can either compel and constrain involvement in politics and coverage. What allows political participation?
Drury regards the political difficulties of the trendy global to be completely Biblical. within the politics of the Twenty-first century, we discover both smug and self-righteous civilizations confronting each other. each one is confident that it's at the part of God, fact and justice, whereas its enemy is allied with devil, wickedness and barbarism.
Have been America's Founders Christians or deists? Conservatives and secularists have taken every one place respectively, mustering facts to insist simply how tall the wall keeping apart church and kingdom could be. Now Gregg Frazer places their arguments to leisure within the first complete research of the Founders' ideals as they themselves expressed them-showing that modern-day political correct and left are either improper.
Extra resources for A Jealous God: Science's Crusade Against Religion
14. For a discussion of Tillich’s influence and life, see Mark Kline Taylor, Paul Tillich: The Theologian of Boundaries (Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 1991); and Wilhelm and Marion Pauck, Paul Tillich: His Life and Thought, vol. 1, Life (New York: Harper & Row, 1976). 15. Paul Tillich, The Socialist Decision, trans. Franklin Sherman (New York: Harper & Row, 1977), 71. 16. ” Sometimes he refers to them as aspects of the divine life or moments within the process of the divine life. When used in this sense, which somewhat differs from the use as roots of trinitarian thinking in the history of religious experience, he is referring to three moments.
This necessity carries its own risk. The analyst may be carried too far afield such that comprehensiveness and complexity, rather than revealing truth, may just conceal or complicate it. In order to avoid this obvious pitfall, I have carefully developed a rubric that will bring order to the various discourses at work in this book. 38 Chapter 1 3. See Mark C. Taylor, Confidence Games: Money and Markets in a World Without Redemption (Chicago: University of Chicago, 2004); Philip Goodchild, “Capital and Kingdom: An Eschatological Ontology,” in Theology and the Political: The New Debate, ed.
Such an interlocutor may argue in this way: Money being the chief representative of market capitalism, which strives in cutthroat competition for maximum gain at the expense of any virtue cannot have any intrinsic virtue in its practice. I have three responses to the interlocutor. First, in the Tillichian viewpoint of this book I will state that money may be demonic, but it is not a pure negative and destructive evil. Tillich once wrote that the purpose of understanding social demonry is to liberate the good in it: Only when this dialectics is understood, is a fundamentally correct attitude in social affairs possible.